
The BBC reported today that Italy was to open its first prison to serve specifically transgender prison population. In terms of its policy and service, such a move is welcome and progressive.
The US, however, doesn’t have specific institutions for its transgendered inmates, instead it employs the following policy:
This rigid policy can result in housing a woman (male-to-female trans) with a male inmate in the same cell. When this occurs, violent and/or sexual assault is common. Karen Franklin PhD posits that the prison system in the US establishes for transgendered youth a track toward future incarceration;
So Italy is leading by example? Well, yes and no. The prison at Pozzale (near Florence) was formerly a women’s prison subject to senior staff abuses, consequent court battles and ongoing bureaucracy ensuring mismanagement of resources. Recently it has housed only two inmates while other prisons in the area were overcrowded. The transgender prison is the socially-responsible solution; a new start for an institution with a corrupt past.

There is a total dearth of photographs of this institution, but also of trangender prisoners in the media today. I hadn’t paid it any thought until I was pressed to search for images for this post. I hope and expect that photojournalists will document activities at the prison once the new inmates arrive. It is a worthy story; there is a need. I suspect the Italian authorities would want to put a positive media spin on the story, and also on the trangender realities that are unfortunately still uncomfortable and/or controversial for some members of the public.
Further reading

3 comments
Comments feed for this article
January 25, 2010 at 4:54 am
blaark
It is with great shame that I feel compelled to ask– was the facility opened in an existing structure or did the Italian authorities specifically design the grounds as a funny hah-hah for passing aviators in the know?
January 25, 2010 at 10:17 am
petebrook
Existing structure!
March 23, 2011 at 3:43 am
Bibi
The US policy can also result in housing a man (female to male transition) with the female inmate population. Is there not equal consideration made for both? Surely, a man (female by birth and gender re-asssigned) will want to be in the male population as well. I think your argument is flawed and needs to be refined to address both genders.