
© Anton Kratochvil, from the series 'Homage to Abu Ghraib' (2006)
It may not be wise to question a photography project that was conceived of, and produced, in honour of the photographer’s father who was tortured in Stalinist labour camps.
But, is not Anton Kratochvil’s Homage to Abu Ghraib obsolete?
Kratochvil spoke at this weeks photo expo.
We can presume that everyone who saw and then virally-forwarded these images knew already about Abu Ghraib. I can’t imagine that this series converted new recruits into the anti-war mindset or lured them into new emotional responses to the horrors of the War On Iraq or of Saddam’s primary prison/death-house.
Saddam Hussein’s ordered rushed and final hour executions of some opponents and turned others loose. Then the American Military moved in. Kratochvil’s images contain disconcerting echoes of US abuses at Abu Ghraib, but those echoes are insufficient, even unnecessary, in the context of the original images.
Only the personal catharsis and healing this series may or may not have provided Kratochvil could stand as basis for a discussion of worth here. And that, still, does not alter my personal opinion that this “homage” is misplaced at best, derisory at worst.
More here
3 comments
Comments feed for this article
October 26, 2009 at 4:56 am
Homage to Abu Ghraib? « Prison Photography | The Click
[…] Link: Homage to Abu Ghraib? « Prison Photography […]
April 23, 2011 at 12:01 pm
Watercolours are Vital Accessories to Commentary on Infamous Abu Ghraib Photos « Prison Photography
[…] consideration of the broad range of artists’ responses (from good to bad) to the Abu Ghraib images of torture, for me, Daniel Heyman’s paintings carry an impact far […]
January 25, 2012 at 6:17 pm
Selma Waldman’s ‘Black Book of Aggressors’ « Prison Photography
[…] extends the horror and successfully creates something significantly different and more nuanced. (I point people towards Antonin Kratochvil’s Homage to Abu Ghraib as an example of how photography can fail in […]