You should know by now that I am obsessed with the l’Impossible Photographie exhibition in Paris (here, here, here and here).
There is a paucity of information about the full line-up of photographers in the show, compounded by very few online images of those we do know about.
Brendan Seibel, the author of this review, and I have been exchanging emails and he has been filling me in.
First of all, many of the photographs from contemporary shooters had faces intentionally covered. This is due to French privacy laws.
There were shots of juvenile detention for which the photographer intentionally obscured faces through shutter drag or by means of scratched glass or the people covering their faces.
Other photographers shooting adults had either empty rooms, shots of people from behind, or the photos were displayed with marking tape covering the faces. Marc Feustel of Eye Curious thought it was funny, or interesting at least- I found it pretty inexcusable, particularly given the subject matter of the exhibition. Impossible Photography indeed.
I am gobsmacked! I asked Brendan to clarify. He did:
When I say tape on the pictures I mean the glass pane, not the prints themselves. Which is why I assume there’s some gallery work behind this manner of obstruction.
What!? Art-handlers and/or curators took the decision to use gaffer tape to make anonymous the portrait sitters!? Why bother using the photographs at all if you plan to deface them?
To apply tape after the fact is either a fantastic dada-turn (by artist, curator or the two in partnership) or it is the most ham-fisted exhibiting practice in recent history.
You might as well stop caring which way is UP^. What would the Art Handling Olympians say?
The three images above are not prints from the show.
They are illustrations I put together in my front room using a pane of glass, some gaffer tape and three portraits from Luigi Gariglio’s excellent book Portraits in Prisons.
Gariglio was not in the l’Impossible Photographie show.
4 comments
Comments feed for this article
April 11, 2010 at 3:41 am
cieldequimper
I went to visit this exhibition yesterday.
April 11, 2010 at 9:46 am
petebrook
How as the exhibition? Any photographers stand out? And possibly most importantly, did you see the tape? 😉
April 12, 2010 at 11:53 am
cieldequimper
I’m sorry, I went for personal reasons, I didn’t go for the photography as such so no names particularly stand out. Yes, I did see the tape. I had commented previously on your blog saying that it was probably due to French privacy laws, which you confirmed.
The exhibition is good, courageous and I thought it was extremely interesting and welcome, though I’m sure the general public couldn’t care less.
I bought the book and have started to read it. It’s terrifying.
April 19, 2010 at 2:31 am
Marc
Pete, I think that the gaffer tape overstates what was done in the exhibition. I will admit that I only went to the opening of the show (which was jam-packed) and I haven’t been back since so my memory may be failing me. In my recollection the tape was only used on older prints and we are talking about thin pieces of tape not 5cm think gaffer tape (if that makes any difference). My guess is that these images were taken from the archives of the city of Paris and that since they were not accompanied by an authorisation from the people in them that a Paris city museum cannot legally exhibit them and so this was their solution they came up with. I think in later photographs there were some portraits without tape (presumably these were authorised). My view is that it was preferable to have these prints exhibited with the piece of tape rather than to entirely exclude images of prisoners unless they were accompanied by some kind of authorisation from the person in the picture (which would have hugely restricted the pool of images that could be used for the show). Also, whether you think that the tape provides the people in the photograph with some form of privacy or whether you think that it is a gross negation of their humanity or dignity, it does say something interesting about the state of both the prison system and the rules governing photography in France.