I’ve seen Martin Luther King’s mugshot many times (last year, on MLK Day I posted this same mugshot), but I had not noticed the scrawls upon it. Robert Gumpert pointed them out to me.
Someone accessed the police archive following MLK’s death to struggle with a biro pen in writing the date of his assassination.
We all know the famous photograph by Charles Moore of MLK’s arrest in Montgomery, Alabama and perhaps one or two photographs of MLK imprisoned in Birmingham Jail; MLK’s letters and the civil rights education have made the narrative and context for MLK’s arrests well known.
That is why I think an intimate tale into the biography of this mugshot would be fascinating. Through whose hands has it passed? How has it’s meaning changed? Is the copy with the scrawls the only original copy? Where are the original prints now archived?
The answers are probably easy to find and I’m just thinking out loud here.
THOUGHTS ON MUGSHOTS
This blog-post is just yet another seedling to a potential chapter of a potential book on mugshots.
I don’t think I’m the one to write a book about mugshots but a few trends make it a visual territory in rapid flux. The current racket and sleazy business opportunities they afford; the mugshot as ubiquitous as Facebook profile pics; their role as photobook Objet d’art; and mugshots’ new-found glory as consumer items, all point toward changing ideas toward – and uses of – this old photographic form.
3 comments
Comments feed for this article
January 22, 2013 at 12:45 pm
blake
http://www.amazon.com/LEAST-WANTED-Mark-Michaelson/dp/3865212913
January 22, 2013 at 1:00 pm
petebrook
Blake, I’m familiar with the book. I’ve not seen it though. What is it’s nature? I’m interested in moving on from collections of historical mugshots into a discussion about mugshots and digitized law enforcement databases in the 21st century. The appearances and uses of mugshots has changed massively. It seems some of the state power that Finn describes in his book, Capturing The Criminal Image, has been transferred to the general public by virtue of imagery moving online and not being legislated?
http://www.upress.umn.edu/book-division/books/capturing-the-criminal-image
August 28, 2013 at 5:24 pm
jewel
First, wow – I hadn’t heard of the mugshot book fetching such a price. (Sometimes it takes me 8 months to get around to catching up on the world!)
This reminds me of a discussion that unsettled me somewhat a while back. And that was with folks interested in leveraging the public mugshot databases alongside facial recognition software with up and coming technologies like Google Glass. Where I would have formerly seen a book of mugshots akin to a book of photobooth shots, I can’t shake the bad taste of prejudice creeping in. Getting booked doesn’t mean one was convicted, yet having the information publicly available (with a less-than-flattering pict nonetheless) encourages folks to make quick decisions on a person’s character. Is there something about the photos in book form that has us less apt to judge than when we see the pictures on Google? Or soon, virtually overlaying people as we’re walking down the street? Ok, that’s straying a bit… still.