In the interests of full disclosure, DuckRabbit and Prison Photography have become virtually-close these past couple of months, beginning with an acknowledged shared politic, via encouraging support, to a mention in DuckRabbit’s announcement of a daring competition that I feel I had only a small part to do with.
I am not advertising DuckRabbit’s $1,000 competition for brevity’s sake. I am promoting it because:
a) Stan Banos had an excellent point in the first instance
b) DuckRabbit has not been shy to challenge inequalities before (including MSF – opening dialogue, discussing visual ethics and celebrating consequent positive representations on MSF’s photoblog)
c) PDN, with an all-white 25 juror panel has a valid charge of passive racism to answer.
d) I think it is a ballsy move, and I want to see what comes of it.
Up for the debate?
FOR $1,000 YOU MUST;
“Come to PDN’s defense and answer the question, ‘What possible, plausible excuse could exist for an all white jury from a publication of such influence?’”
2 comments
Comments feed for this article
June 11, 2009 at 3:42 am
duckrabbit
Thanks Pete.
Thanks to concerned people like yourself PDN have now responded and admitted their failure. A good start. Duckrabbit is still wading through the hate mail we’ve received.
What saddens me most is people’s inability to understand that we all different. And. that those differences get projected onto photographs when we look at them. One of the key factors in our uniqueness is our ethnicity. The more experience on a judging panel, the more perspectives we’ll get on the work, the deeper the competition, the more universally acclaimed the winners.
Honestly Pete, I feel defeated.
June 20, 2009 at 6:55 pm
Skin color and the photography industry | dvafoto
[…] at Duckrabbit and then blossomed into a conversation in the photography blog echo chamber. Prison Photography, Politics, Theory & Photography, APhotoADay, Conscientious, Photo Business News & Forum, […]